![]() ![]() MRIs were evaluated for inflammation, blooming artifact and complications including vascular injury, tracheoesophageal fistula, esophageal perforation and spondylodiscitis, and compared to endoscopy, esophagram and bronchoscopy.ResultsTwenty-three patients with button battery ingestions had a total of 51 MRI/MR angiograms. Clinical data, endoscopic findings and all imaging studies were rereviewed. Our goal was to review MRI/MR angiography imaging in button battery ingestion cases and compare with other imaging, clinical data and outcomes in these patients.Materials and methodsIn this retrospective institutional-review-board-approved study, we reviewed all button battery ingestion cases with MRI from April 2012 to September 2018. ![]() To aid in clinical decision-making, we began obtaining magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)/MR angiography in these patients.Objective Lithium button battery ingestions have been increasing in frequency since the early 2000s and can develop severe and sometimes fatal complications from caustic injury even after rapid battery removal.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |